Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Arthur Baker's avatar

I think the main reason is tractability. It’s non-obvious how to steer policymakers towards more migration-friendly policies. Lots of non-EA orgs do broad advocacy for things that they think are important, even if tractability is low. EAs tend to do much less (apart from the existential risk guys who have a different calculus).

BUT there’s still stuff going on Check out Malengo! And Charity Entrepreneurship are incubating a migration-focused program. Neither of these have a particularly capitalist framing, although neither are explicitly leftist. You should check them out!

Expand full comment
Ebenezer's avatar

If immigration benefits host countries, why is there so much anti-immigrant backlash in countries which have recently received high immigration levels?

Pushing for more open borders, given the current immigration sentiment, seems quite foolish. The only way to do it is either to apply ever-more-stringent illiberal/anti-democratic measures: https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2025/08/europe-free-speech-republicans/683915/ Or else, to find a way to achieve immigration in a way that makes it actually popular, so you can achieve the necessary democratic mandate. (For example, encourage a housing buildout well in advance of immigration liberalization, so rents don't skyrocket when the immigrants come. Track immigrant crime and automatically screen immigrants who are deemed high-risk. Etc.)

Expand full comment

No posts